Whistleblower protection is a cornerstone of effective anti-corruption frameworks and a key element of the rule of law in EU candidate and potential candidate countries. In contexts where corruption risks remain high and public trust in institutions is often fragile, enabling individuals to report wrongdoing safely and without fear of retaliation is essential. The EU Whistleblower Protection Directive provides an important baseline for such systems and serves as a reference point in the EU accession process. While progress has been made, aligning national frameworks with these EU standards and with best practice remains a critical step towards strengthening accountability, transparency and democratic governance across the region.
This report reviews developments across all ten EU candidate and potential candidate countries, with a focus of the seven countries that have adopted national-level, cross-sectoral whistleblower protection legislation – Albania, Kosovo, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia and Ukraine. It finds that compliance with the Directrive remains uneven and incomplete, with most countries falling short in at least one key area, including restrictive conditions for protection, limitations on reporting channels, weak provisions on the burden of proof, and gaps in penalties. Beyond formal compliance, the report highlights broader structural weaknesses, including limited scope of protection, inconsistencies in the treatment of anonymous reporting, and significant shortcomings in data collection and transparency. It calls for targeted reforms by national policymakers and authorities and stronger support from the European Commission to ensure full alignment, strengthen implementation capacity, and build effective, inclusive and trustworthy whistleblower protection frameworks.
Report can be seen on the following link Whistleblower protection in EU enlargement countries – Towards EU standards and best practice?
